Real-world Effectiveness and Causal Mediation Study of BNT162b2 on Long COVID Risks in Children and Adolescents (preprint)

BackgroundThe impact of pre-infection vaccination on the risk of long COVID remains unclear in the pediatric population. Further, it is unknown if such pre-infection vaccination can mitigate the risk of long COVID beyond its established protective benefits against SARS-CoV-2 infection. ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of BNT162b2 on long COVID risks with various strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in children and adolescents, using comparative effectiveness methods. To disentangle the overall effectiveness of the vaccine on long COVID outcomes into its independent impact and indirect impact via prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections, using causal mediation analysis. DesignReal-world vaccine effectiveness study and mediation analysis in three independent cohorts: adolescents (12 to 20 years) during the Delta phase, children (5 to 11 years) and adolescents (12 to 20 years) during the Omicron phase. SettingTwenty health systems in the RECOVER PCORnet electronic health record (EHR) Program. Participants112,590 adolescents (88,811 vaccinated) in the Delta period, 188,894 children (101,277 vaccinated), and 84,735 adolescents (37,724 vaccinated) in the Omicron period. ExposuresFirst dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine vs. no receipt of COVID-19 vaccine. MeasurementsOutcomes of interest include conclusive or probable diagnosis of long COVID following a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection, and body-system-specific condition clusters of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), such as cardiac, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, respiratory, and syndromic categories. The effectiveness was reported as (1-relative risk)*100 and mediating effects were reported as relative risks. ResultsDuring the Delta period, the estimated effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against long COVID among adolescents was 95.4% (95% CI: 90.9% to 97.7%). During the Omicron phase, the estimated effectiveness against long COVID among children was 60.2% (95% CI: 40.3% to 73.5%) and 75.1% (95% CI: 50.4% to 87.5%) among adolescents. The direct effect of vaccination, defined as the effect beyond their impact on SARS-CoV-2 infections, was found to be statistically non-significant in all three study cohorts, with estimates of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.55) in the Delta study among adolescents, 1.24 (95% CI: 0.92 to 1.66) among children and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.69 to 1.19) among adolescents in the Omicron studies. Meanwhile, the estimated indirect effects, which are effects through protecting SARS-CoV-2 infections, were estimated as 0.04 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.05) among adolescents during Delta phase, 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23 to 0.42) among children and 0.21 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.27) among adolescents during the Omicron period. LimitationsObservational study design and potentially undocumented infection. ConclusionsOur study suggests that BNT162b2 was effective in reducing risk of long COVID outcomes in children and adolescents during the Delta and Omicron periods. The mediation analysis indicates the vaccines effectiveness is primarily derived from its role in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Primary Funding SourceNational Institutes of Health.

Pediatric Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Prescribing Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic (preprint)

Objective. This study was conducted to identify rates of pediatric nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) prescriptions overall and by patient characteristics. Methods. Patients up to 23 years old with a clinical encounter and a nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid, n/r) prescription in a PEDSnet-affiliated institution between December 1, 2021 and September 14, 2022 were identified using electronic health record (EHR) data. Results. Of the 1,496,621 patients with clinical encounters during the study period, 920 received a nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescription (mean age 17.2 years; SD 2.76 years). 40% (367/920) of prescriptions were provided to individuals aged 18-23, and 91% (838/920) of prescriptions occurred after April 1, 2022. The majority of patients (70%; 648/920) had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose at least 28 days before nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescription. Only 40% (371/920) of individuals had documented COVID-19 within the 0 to 6 days prior to receiving a nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescription. 53% (485/920) had no documented COVID-19 infection in the EHR. Among nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescription recipients, 64% (586/920) had chronic or complex chronic disease and 9% (80/920) had malignant disease. 38/920 (4.5%) were hospitalized within 30 days of receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Conclusion. Clinicians prescribe nirmatrelvir/ritonavir infrequently to children. While individuals receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir generally have significant chronic disease burden, a majority are receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescriptions without an EHR-recorded COVID-19 positive test or diagnosis. Development and implementation of concerted pediatric nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing workflows can help better capture COVID-19 presentation, response, and adverse events at the population level.

Clinical Subphenotypes of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children: An EHR-based cohort study from the RECOVER program (preprint)

Background: Multi-system inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) represents one of the most severe post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children, and there is a critical need to characterize its disease patterns for improved recognition and management. Our objective was to characterize subphenotypes of MIS-C based on presentation, demographics and laboratory parameters. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children with MIS-C from March 1, 2020 - April 30, 2022 and cared for in 8 pediatric medical centers that participate in PEDSnet. We included demographics, symptoms, conditions, laboratory values, medications and outcomes (ICU admission, death), and grouped variables into eight categories according to organ system involvement. We used a heterogeneity-adaptive latent class analysis model to identify three clinically-relevant subphenotypes. We further characterized the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of each subphenotype, and evaluated their temporal patterns. Findings: We identified 1186 children hospitalized with MIS-C. The highest proportion of children (44.4%) were aged between 5-11 years, with a male predominance (61.0%), and non-Hispanic white ethnicity (40.2%). Most (67.8%) children did not have a chronic condition. Class 1 represented children with a severe clinical phenotype, with 72.5% admitted to the ICU, higher inflammatory markers, hypotension/shock/dehydration, cardiac involvement, acute kidney injury and respiratory involvement. Class 2 represented a moderate presentation, with 4-6 organ systems involved, and some overlapping features with acute COVID-19. Class 3 represented a mild presentation, with fewer organ systems involved, lower CRP, troponin values and less cardiac involvement. Class 1 initially represented 51.1% of children early in the pandemic, which decreased to 33.9% from the pre-delta period to the omicron period. Interpretation: MIS-C has a spectrum of clinical severity, with degree of laboratory abnormalities rather than the number of organ systems involved providing more useful indicators of severity. The proportion of severe/critical MIS-C decreased over time.